Nearly half of tariff-paying firms still plan tariff-driven price hikes, more than a year after the current Trump administration’s first tariffs took effect. That is the real signal in the New York Fed’s latest survey: this cost shock is not moving through the economy in one clean burst.

Tariff-Driven Price Hikes Threaten to Haunt 2026 Inflation
XOOMAR Intelligence
Analyst Take
The finding, reported by PYMNTS, points to a longer inflation tail than a simple “one-time” tariff adjustment would suggest. In a Wednesday, July 8 blog post, New York Fed economists said many firms are still raising prices, and some expect to do so more than six months from now.
“This behavior extends the period over which tariff-related price pressures work their way through the economy.”
That sentence is the warning. Tariffs may be set by policy, but prices reset through contracts, supplier negotiations, customer tolerance, and margin math. Those clocks do not move together.
Tariff-driven price hikes are becoming part of business pricing architecture
The headline number is blunt: among firms that directly paid tariffs, 47% of service firms and 44% of manufacturers said they still plan more tariff-induced price increases, according to the New York Fed’s Liberty Street Economics post.
That matters because the tariffs are no longer a fresh shock. The first tariffs of the current Trump administration have been in place for more than a year. If companies are still raising prices now, the adjustment is not just a short-term reaction. It is being folded into how firms manage revenue, contracts, and customer expectations.
The timing also pushes the story beyond 2026. Among tariff-paying service firms, 16% plan to raise prices more than six months from the July 8 post. Among tariff-paying manufacturers, 7% plan to do the same. XOOMAR analysis: since those increases are scheduled more than six months after early July 2026, part of the price pressure likely carries into 2027.
The New York Fed numbers show pass-through is still alive
The survey separates two realities that often get blurred. Not every company is still raising prices. But enough tariff-paying firms are that the pass-through process remains unfinished.
| Tariff-paying firms | Plan price hikes within six months | Plan price hikes more than six months out | Fully passed through tariffs | No further hikes planned | Tariffs had little cost impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service firms | 31% | 16% | 29% | 21% | 3% |
| Manufacturers | 37% | 7% | 18% | 30% | 8% |
The import exposure is also broad. The New York Fed said two-thirds of service firms and almost all manufacturers import at least some inputs. Among those importers, 40% of service firms and 70% of manufacturers said they directly paid tariffs over the previous 12 months.
There is a second channel too. The New York Fed noted that many firms faced higher costs from suppliers who paid tariffs and charged higher prices to customers. That means tariff-driven price hikes do not require every company to be the importer of record. Supplier pass-through can carry the cost downstream.
This is why the inflation signal does not need to hit every category equally. A persistent set of increases across enough firms can keep price pressure sticky, even if some companies have already absorbed, passed through, or dismissed the cost impact.
Contracts and caution explain why the price hikes keep coming
The New York Fed identified two main reasons firms are still planning price increases.
First, some businesses operate under contracts with fixed selling prices. They cannot raise prices until those contracts expire. That forces them to absorb tariff costs temporarily, then recover them later.
Second, some companies are raising prices gradually. The New York Fed described this as a “trickle up” approach, where firms avoid a sudden price jump and instead move in smaller steps. That lets them test customer tolerance while keeping room to accelerate if input costs keep rising.
The uncertainty around future tariff policy adds another delay. The economists cited possible rate changes, exemptions, and responses from other countries as reasons firms may choose “cautious, incremental pricing strategies” rather than large one-off increases.
XOOMAR analysis: that is the key behavioral shift. Once companies decide customers are more likely to accept smaller repeated increases than one sharp surcharge, the tariff shock becomes a pricing process. It stops looking like a discrete tax event and starts looking like a rolling margin repair program.
Consumers, businesses, the Fed, and the White House face different tariff realities
Consumers experience tariff pass-through as higher prices. They do not see the contract terms, supplier invoices, or margin calculations behind the increase. They just see the final bill.
Businesses face the messier trade-off. Raise prices too quickly, and customers may push back. Absorb costs too long, and margins take the hit. Wait for policy clarity, and the firm may lose months of recovery time if tariffs remain in place.
For the Federal Reserve, the problem is subtler. Tariff inflation can be treated as a supply-side price-level shock in theory. But the New York Fed’s survey suggests “one-time” does not mean immediate. The economists wrote that “what ‘one-time’ means in practice may be a drawn-out affair, especially when the tariffs change frequently.”
That is why tariff-driven price hikes matter for rate expectations. XOOMAR’s recent market coverage of Gold Price Fights for $4,100 as Fed Hawks Bite Hard and Silver Price Forecast Buckles Under Fed Risk Below $61 shows how sensitive assets can be to the inflation and Fed-policy narrative.
The White House can argue tariffs serve broader trade goals. The survey does not adjudicate that claim. It does, however, undercut any claim that households are insulated from the cost, because the New York Fed found that tariff-paying firms are still passing those costs through.
The clean “one-time adjustment” story is breaking down
The New York Fed’s most useful contribution is not just the percentage of firms planning price increases. It is the explanation of timing.
A tariff may be imposed on a specific date. But businesses do not all reset prices on that date. Some wait for contracts to expire. Some move in stages. Some react to suppliers. Some watch competitors. Some delay because they do not know whether rates, exemptions, or foreign responses will change.
That creates staggered inflation. The original tariff action becomes less important than the sequence of price decisions it triggers.
The New York Fed also pointed to earlier evidence. In June 2025, about two months after tariffs took root, it found that three-quarters of companies across service and manufacturing industries had passed along higher input costs on tariffed goods to end consumers, according to PYMNTS. In February 2025, it said foreign exporters were paying a growing share of the cost of new tariffs, but U.S. importers still paid most of it. As of November 2025, foreign exporters were paying 14% of the tariff cost, while U.S. importers were paying 86%.
That split matters. If U.S. importers shoulder most of the cost, the pressure must be absorbed somewhere: margins, customers, suppliers, or a mix of all three.
Pricing power is the earnings fault line
For shoppers, the risk is a slower return to normal purchasing power in categories touched by imported inputs or supplier pass-through. The source material does not identify specific consumer categories, so the clean conclusion is broader: the tariff channel is still active.
For companies, the divide is pricing power. Firms that can raise prices without losing too much demand have more room to protect margins. Firms with weaker pricing power face a harsher choice between margin compression and customer pushback.
PYMNTS also cited its Intelligence report, “How Middle-Market Business Uncertainty Rewrote 2025,” which found that larger companies were better able than smaller ones to raise prices and drop underperforming products to cushion the tariff hit. XOOMAR analysis: that suggests tariff pass-through can widen the operating gap between firms with scale and firms without it.
The evidence to watch is straightforward. If future New York Fed surveys show the share of firms planning price hikes falling sharply, the tariff impulse is fading. If the share remains near half of tariff-paying firms, markets should stop treating tariffs as a headline that ends at implementation. The cost story has a longer tail.
Impact Analysis
- Tariff-related inflation may persist longer than a one-time price shock.
- Businesses are embedding tariff costs into contracts, pricing, and margin decisions.
- Consumers could keep seeing delayed price increases well past the initial tariff rollout.
Tariff-Driven Price Hike Plans by Firm Type
| Firm type | Still plan tariff-induced price increases | Plan increases more than six months after July 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Service firms | 47% | 16% |
| Manufacturers | 44% | 7% |
Tariff-Paying Firms Still Planning Price Hikes
Sources
Written by
XOOMAR Insights Team
Research and Editorial Desk
The XOOMAR Insights Team pairs automated research with human editorial judgment. We track hundreds of sources across technology, fintech, trading, SaaS, and cybersecurity, cross-check the facts, and explain what happened, why it matters, and what to watch next. We do not just rewrite headlines. Every article is fact-checked and scored for reliability before it goes live, and we link back to the original sources so you can verify anything yourself.
Explore More Topics
Related Articles
Global TrendsCosts Trap 49% of Young Adults Living With Parents
Nearly half of Americans under 30 lived with a parent last year, as rent and daily costs turn independence into a luxury.
Global TrendsABC FCC Fight Drags The View’s News Shield Into 2026
ABC says the FCC is using a candidate interview to threaten The View’s news status, raising First Amendment stakes before 2026.
Global TrendsCuban Doctors Save Calabria ERs as US Pressure Bites
Calabria is keeping more than 200 Cuban doctors despite US pressure because without them, some emergency rooms may close.
Global TrendsGraham Platner Senate Campaign Craters After Assault Claim
Graham Platner quit Maine's Senate race after an assault allegation, turning a Democratic pickup chance into a vetting crisis.
Global TrendsHormuz Port Blasts Pull US Strikes Against Iran Into Crisis
New US strikes hit near Hormuz port cities, raising the risk that a military exchange turns into a shipping and oil-market crisis.
TradingGBP/USD Price Forecast Bets on UK Calm Above 1.3400
GBP/USD holds above 1.3400 as UK political risk eases, but the Sterling bid looks fragile without stronger macro support.
FintechSony Stablecoin Bank Clears U.S. Hurdle With $40M Bet
Sony Bank won conditional OCC approval for a $40M U.S. trust bank, but its stablecoin can't launch until final approvals arrive.
TechnologyThree GPT-5.6 Models Thrust OpenAI Into Cybersecurity
OpenAI's GPT-5.6 arrives in three tiers, with Sol pitched as a more efficient coding and cybersecurity model for enterprise buyers.
CybersecurityAI Attacks Force Open Source Patch Race With Lightwell
IBM and Red Hat are turning Lightwell into a trusted patch lane for open-source code as AI makes vulnerability cleanup a speed contest.
TechnologyMeta AI Glasses Privacy Fix Can't Hide Its Data Grab
Meta’s LED safeguard tackles secret recording, but it doesn't fix the deeper privacy fight over data collection and AI training.
Don't miss the signal
Get our weekly roundup of the stories that matter across tech, fintech, and trading. No noise, just signal.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.